Institutional Real Estate Asia Pacific

July 1, 2011: Vol. 3, Number 7

$150.00 Add To Cart

From the Current Issue

Asia Pacific

The Great Real Estate Debate: After the Global Financial Crisis, Many Investors Have Renewed Faith in Real Estate

While there’s still a strong case to be made for real estate as an important asset class, many institutional investors are grappling with concerns about property’s proper place in their portfolios, more than two years after the onset of the global financial crisis. Many investors are rethinking their strategies, more aware of the implications of their size, capabilities and short- and long-term goals. To invest smarter, they are seeking greater understanding of and control over various aspects of their real estate holdings, and are determined to implement lessons learned and avoid a highly unpleasant repeat of history. Now is also likely the perfect time to take advantage of opportunities that may not come around again.

Asia Pacific

Wind in the Sails: Markets Are Laying the Foundations for Growth, and Investors Are Recognizing the Benefits of a Targeted Allocation to Real Estate

The commercial real estate recovery that many investors hoped would take root has now started in earnest. Prime assets in core markets have led the way with strengthening occupancies, diminishing concessions and rising rents. The signs pointing to this recovery have not gone unnoticed, as evidenced by last year’s re-emergence of equity and debt capital and the pronounced decline in initial yields.

Asia Pacific

Managers Reshuffle the Deck: Some Firms Retrench, While Others Seek to Grow Asset Base

The chaos of the financial markets’ implosion and the ensuing Great Recession has subsided, although significant uncertainty remains. Now that many economies around the world are showing slow but sustainable growth and liquidity has returned to the commercial property markets, investment managers around the globe are moving to shore up their portfolios and also take advantage of favourable buying opportunities and low interest rates.

Asia Pacific

Could You Repeat That? Analyzing Return Persistence in Opportunistic Private Equity Real Estate Funds

Nearly every pitch book contains the same basic disclaimer: “Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.” Yet investors continue to analyze managers’ track records as one way to identify strong future performers. And managers continue to claim top-quartile performance as a way to attract capital. Is this a worthwhile exercise? Or are there simply too many variables for fund-level performance to be useful?

Forgot your username or password?