- June 1, 2009: Vol. 3, Number 6

To read this full article you need to be subscribed to Institutional Real Estate Europe

To Re or Not to Re

by Chris Ford

Following the very negative returns from almost all risky assets in 2008, many pension funds that adopted a fixed weight strategic asset allocation policy will now find themselves substantially underweight to riskier assets compared to more secure assets.

Our general view at this time is not to rebalance andto review the suitability of the existing strategic asset allocation policy. In this article, we cover the key reasons behind this advice and add some commentary on circumstances where it may be less relevant.


Rebalancing, at its heart, is a process for keeping asset exposure close to an agreed target benchmark, and is beneficial because it limits the risk of returns diverging substantially from the benchmark. This is a real risk for those who are open to criticism from third parties who do not fully understand the investment policy being adopted.


Glossary, videos, podcasts, research in the Resource Center

Forgot your username or password?

Close your account?

Your account will be closed and all data will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. Are you sure?

We respect your privacy! Please give consent for processing data as described in our Privacy Policy