Publications

- December 1, 2014: Vol. 26, Number 11

To read this full article you need to be subscribed to Institutional Real Estate Americas

Risk-adjusted returns: Like Potter Stewart said, you know it when you see it

by Roy Schneiderman

I promise there will be no Greek symbols in this article. In fact, there is virtually no mathematics at all. Rather, this column is going to try to deconstruct just what real estate professionals mean when they talk about risk-adjusted returns and provide some commentary on the various uses.

In my experience, there are a few general uses of the phrase “risk-adjusted returns” by real estate professionals and they are not consistent with each other. One use comes in the context of asset allocations. In this context, risk-adjusted returns for private real estate are compared to the risk-adjusted returns for other asset classes. And, strangely enough, real estate tends to look good “on a risk-adjusted basis” in most of the studies I have seen, although that may have as much to do with the fact that I am seeing the studies produced by and for real estate people as it has to do with relative risk-adjusted returns.

But there is one thing I can say about these studies:

Glossary, videos, podcasts, research in the Resource Center

Forgot your username or password?

Close your account?

Your account will be closed and all data will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. Are you sure?

We respect your privacy! Please give consent for processing data as described in our Privacy Policy