We believe a strategic allocation to innovation will likely evolve into a sub-asset class, as did the “niche” strategy of the 1980s — emerging markets. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, investors had little, if any, exposure to what has evolved into 13 percent of the global equity market capitalization, and 60 percent of global gross domestic product (GDP) on a purchasing power parity basis. In 1981, while proposing a global public equity fund for developing countries, Antoine van Agtmael of the International Finance Corp. (IFC) coined the term “emerging markets.” The IFC began tracking total return data for 10 developing markets and discovered “attractive results … making a good case for increased investment.”
Initially, many investors resisted exposure to developing markets based on the volatility associated with geopolitical uncertainties, corporate governance and liquidity. With time, however, they observed low correlations between and among the stock returns of the various developing nations, as well as growth rates that far surpassed those in the developed world. Investors concluded that broad-based exposure to developing markets offered enough diversification to minimize idiosyncratic risks and lower volatility, resulting in higher risk-
Launched in 1988, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index marked the beginning of a new investable sub-asset class for public equity portfolios. The index included only 10 developing nations but enabled allocators to track the local equity markets of rapidly growing emerging nations.
During the late 80s and early 90s, allocators that made a strategic decision to reallocate some of their global equity portfolio from developed markets to emerging markets enjoyed the benefits of increased relative returns. Emerging markets stocks, represented by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, outperformed developed markets stocks, represented by MSCI World Index.
We believe innovation will evolve in a similar fashion. We have identified five major innovation platforms and 14 transformative technologies that are likely to provide significant growth and diversification benefits. As costs continue to decline, these technologies are approaching tipping points that — based on our white paper Disruptive Innovation: Why Now? — should unleash waves of demand across sectors and geographies and, in turn, spawn more innovation. While many investors perceive innovative technologies and their associated stocks as volatile and risky, each of them tends to be idiosyncratic, such that collectively we think they can provide enough diversification to minimize risks and lower volatility.
“Pure play” stocks associated with technologies like DNA sequencing, for example, have a fairly low correlation to those associated with collaborative robots or blockchain technology. In fact, the correlations between and among disruptive technologies can be lower than those between and among S&P 500 sectors. The average correlation between S&P sectors is 0.55, more than double the 0.22 associated with the 14 disruptive technologies. As with emerging markets, a diversified basket of innovative stocks has the potential to enhance risk-adjusted returns in global equity portfolios.
In periods of market distress and volatility, investors often recoil from stocks associated with innovation, especially those not in benchmarks, perceiving them to have high betas and asymmetric downside risks. As a result, while investors are flocking back to their benchmarks to lower tracking error in the early stages of a correction, innovation-based strategies tend to underperform broad-based equity indices.
Ironically, during periods of fear, uncertainty and doubt, businesses and consumers can sometimes be more willing to change their behavior and try innovative products and services that are more productive, cheaper and faster. Innovation takes root and typically gains significant market share during tumultuous times, explaining the adage that new leadership emerges toward the end of a bear market. As a result, we believe stocks associated with innovation typically recover much faster than many of the value traps that increasingly populate the traditional indices. Indeed, during these days of explosive innovation, the greater risk during tumultuous times in the market could be in increasing exposure to the incumbents that dominate broad-based indices. The incumbents stand to be disrupted. As mature companies cut costs and R&D to salvage profitability, they may become even less competitive and, in a vicious cycle, lose even more market share.
As was the case with emerging markets, we believe investors are likely to evolve asset allocation and portfolio construction strategies, increasingly incorporating disruptive innovation and identifying stocks poised to benefit from trends misperceived, misunderstood and mispriced in the market. An allocation to innovation has the potential to increase risk-adjusted returns in global equity portfolios in the long term.
Renato Leggi is a client portfolio manager at ARK Invest. Read his complete white paper on the subject at this link: https://bit.ly/2ZqjzGE