Publications

Perspectives: Why “low‑cost” public real estate isn’t as cheap as it looks
Research - APRIL 23, 2026

To read this full article you need to be subscribed to Newsline.

Sign in Sign up for a FREE subscription

Perspectives: Why “low‑cost” public real estate isn’t as cheap as it looks

by Geoffrey Dohrmann

Private wealth advisers are trained — appropriately — to be fee‑sensitive. Over long horizons, costs compound just as returns do. So, when advisers compare private real estate investments with publicly traded REIT funds, the difference in headline fees can appear stark.

A private real estate fund may charge 1.5 percent or more in management fees, plus performance‑based compensation. A REIT ETF may charge 25 basis points or 30 basis points. The conclusion seems obvious: public real estate is cheaper.

But that conclusion is based on a misunderstanding of what those numbers actually represent. A REIT mutual fund or ETF expense ratio reflects the cost of managing a portfolio of securities, not the cost of managing real estate.

That fee pays for stock selection or index

Forgot your username or password?