Publications

Number crunching: How have top-down and bottom-up allocation strategies influenced real estate investment and performance during the past 40-odd years?
- June 1, 2025: Vol. 19, Number 6

To read this full article you need to be subscribed to Institutional Real Estate Europe

Number crunching: How have top-down and bottom-up allocation strategies influenced real estate investment and performance during the past 40-odd years?

by Dominic Smith

If the real estate investment industry is engaged in a culture war, then the analysis you are about to read might prove to be unpopular with one side or — more likely, both sides of it.

A mainstay of MSCI portfolio performance measurement has long been attribution analysis. This seeks to quantify the extent to which a real estate fund’s performance, relative to its benchmark, has been due to allocation or stock selection. The former factor involves a fund manager’s ability to be underweight in underperforming sectors and overweight in outperforming ones, while the latter is all about enhancing returns by investing in better-performing assets within specific sectors. In essence, is relative performance a function of top-down or bottom-up decisions?

In reality, performance is usually determined by a blend of the two methods. The best investment and research processes are therefore underpinned by collaboration across departments, which represent different sectors an

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, Click Here.

Forgot your username or password?